Monday, 22 April 2013

Fiction, memoir and International Consensus Criteria

Charming article from Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie  on fiction and memoir, she says: 'I long for a new form, a cross between fiction and memoir...' and speaks for us all when she says that 'fiction is more honest than memoir'. This is exactly why I wrote The State of Me as a novel and not a memoir, I wanted to get closer to the truth, as I described here. Also, I love that she is so laidback about fiction and memoir overlapping.

I'm re-reading 'On Being Ill', Virginia Woolf's brilliant essay in which she ponders the lack of novels about physical illness: 'The public would say that a novel dedicated to influenza lacked plot ...'.  It made me think of this extract from chapter eleven of my novel:

stranger   What did you do today?

me              I made cheese scones and put a dead bee in the bin. 

*

Last week, I received a few printed and bound copies of The International Consensus Criteria 2012 from Invest in ME, and on re-reading, am struck again by how important such a document is:

Problem
The label ‘chronic fatigue syndrome’ (CFS), coined in the 1980s, has persisted due to lack of knowledge of its etiologic agents and pathophysiology. Misperceptions have arisen because the name ‘CFS’ and its hybrids ME/CFS, CFS/ME and CFS/CF have been used for widely diverse conditions. Patient sets can include those who are seriously ill with ME, many bedridden and unable to care for themselves, to those who have general fatigue or, under the Reeves criteria, patients are not required to have any physical symptoms. There is a poignant need to untangle the web of confusion caused by mixing diverse and often overly inclusive patient populations in one heterogeneous, multi-rubric pot called ‘chronic fatigue syndrome’. We believe this is the foremost cause of diluted and inconsistent research findings, which hinders progress, fosters scepticism, and wastes limited research monies.
 

Solution
Myalgic encephalomyelitis, a name that originated in the 1950s, is the most accurate and appropriate name because it reflects the underlying multi-system pathophysiology of the disease. Our panel strongly recommends that only the name ‘myalgic encephalomyelitis’ be used to identify patients meeting the ICC because a distinctive disease entity should have one name. Patients diagnosed using broader or other criteria for CFS or its hybrids (Oxford, Reeves, London, Fukuda, CCC, etc.) should be reassessed with the ICC. Those who fulfill the criteria have ME; those who do not would remain in the more encompassing CFS classification.

*
 
I wish every GP in the land had a copy on their desk, would stop them writing derivative nonsense like this  (annoys me more as Margaret McCartney is a Glasgow GP, perhaps she thinks consultant neurologists at Southern General routinely gave plasma exchanges for somatisation disorders in 80s?).  Her article is from 2008, maybe she has educated herself since then about biomedical abnormalities, one can only hope. 

The ME Association is, in fact,  sending out educational material to GPs this May. Patients have given names of practices they wish the booklet to go to. Education of GPs is, of course, paramount to stopping the  lazy perpetuation of myths and fiction that has done so much harm to people with my illness. Am curious: are there any 'meeja' doctors in UK who write responsibly and accurately about ME?  I honestly don't know of any.


2 comments:

sarahirving said...

I love that quotation from your book. I felt it highlighted that sense of there being times where getting *anything* done is a major achievement, even if it's something that seems *normal* for most people. I know there are a lot more novels around about mental illness as opposed to physical, and that maybe therefore those of us with the former are 'better represented', but it very much reminded me of conversations I've had with a good friend who has a form of arthritis which comes with major spells of fatigue, for whom one of the major aspects of coming to terms with her condition has been adjusting her demands on herself as a highly social, professional woman and dealing with the fact that she no longer can expect herself to be able to be as active as she used to be. And for me, as a workaholic with spells of severe depression, it's also been that process of not seeing myself as a total failure on those days when getting out of bed and having a shower is a massive achievement. Thanks for encapsulating it so well!

nmj said...

Thanks, Sarah! Glad the quote resonated for you. I think for people who are healthy they would never understand that when you are in a severe phase of illness, that making scones is not just the task of the day but it takes a week's planning/psyching up.